- For large backbone infrastructure (typically large 765kV inter-zonal power transfer lines), we recommend a standard IPT BOOT model, where the private sector finances and builds the grid for a state-backed capacity off-taker. This provides “grid as a service” from the “inside – out”. However the ability of the state to support this strategy through guarantees is limited and Eskom is in a weak financial position. We recommend a model where a portion of the electricity tariff charged to end users is ring-fenced in escrow for IPTs, similar in some ways to the Water Trading Entity arrangement that backs the Trans-Caledon Tunnel Authority. With the BOOT model, the assets can be handed over to Eskom after a fixed period when the capital cost has been amortised.
- For grids connecting and evacuating IPP power into the main Transmission backbone, typically 132kv, 400kv, and up to 765kV lines, we recommend an IPP-backed IPT BOOT model. This would include regulatory and tariff changes to allow IPPs to back the financing of the necessary power line infrastructure. We show that with these changes, IPPs could be incentivised to build a large portion of the IPP power evacuation networks, releasing the financial burden from the national government.
Resources